Difference between revisions of "Category:World Cultures Comparison Project"

From ThePlaz.com

Jump to: navigation, search
(Comments)
(change video link)
 
(117 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[World Cultures]] Comparison Project  
+
[[World Cultures]] Comparison (Final) Project on '''Globalization'''
 
[[Category:World Cultures]]
 
[[Category:World Cultures]]
[[:Image:Comparisions Project Instructions.JPG|Instructions]]
+
----
{{Red Message|Group members please add your name and this: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> after your comments so it it easy to sort out who said what when.  Thanks [[User:ThePlaz|Plaz]] 20:47, 7 December 2006 (EST)}}
+
[[David Groff]], [[Jeff Barry]], [[Greg Nicosia]], and [[Michael Plasmeier]] had to for the [[World Cultures]] final project, compare a specific topic among different nations.  As we brainstormed, it morphed into more about what globalization is all about.  The project consists of a paper along with a 20 minute minimum oral presentation.  We chose to show a introduction video and then debate: globalization: good or bad?.  It was lots of fun and I learned a lot about globalization, a force changing our world today.  So if for good or bad, globalization will change everything.  Our teacher said no one has ever done globalization as a topic.  That was surprising.  So here are all of our brainstorming and work.  Enjoy.
==Topic Brainstorm==
+
(some removed)
+
*economic prosperity (star)
+
*free time use (star)
+
*tv industry
+
*energy demand/supply
+
*the young generations
+
*American influences (star and circle)
+
*transportation
+
*global influences
+
*globalization (underlined)
+
**"the export of artificial wants"
+
  
==2nd Brainstorm: Globalization==
+
{{grade|198|200|Points off for poor time management in debate; but movie was superb and we really knew what we were talking aboutGood job group members!}}
===Title===
+
The Export of Artificial Wants
+
*??or too focused
+
*or too crazy
+
*What does that mean?
+
**it may be clever but if I can't figure it out or Greg can't figure it out, then we shouldn't use it. - Groff
+
***That's the point.  (Well it was more of joke, if you don't want to use it) --[[User:ThePlaz|Plaz]] 20:47, 7 December 2006 (EST)
+
  
===Pos/Neg===
+
==Instructions==
*pos:
+
*[[:Image:Comparisions Project Instructions.JPG|Instructions]]
**better standards of living
+
*[[:Image:Comparision Project Rubric.JPG|Rubric]]
**more equitable distribution of wealth
+
**ending harsh global customs
+
***shria law
+
***etc.
+
**outsourcing makes jobs
+
**good in long term
+
*neg:
+
**putting too much on them?
+
**bad diet?
+
***China
+
**exporting artifical wants
+
**plundering and profits
+
**?talk about imperialism??
+
***India
+
***?or only focus on present?
+
  
===Format===
+
==Planning==
*debate, it seems would work best
+
*[[World Cultures Comparison Project/Topic Brainstorm|Topic Brainstorm]]
**Is Globalization ultimately good or bad?
+
*[[World Cultures Comparison Project/Globalization Brainstorm|Second Brainstorm: Globalization]]
**each person gets topic
+
*[[World Cultures Comparison Project/Forming the Project|Forming the Project Discussions]]
**that way they research that 1 topic
+
*[[World Cultures Comparison Project/Paper/Cut|Cut Sections from Paper]]
**they write a page (or so) about that topic
+
*[[World Cultures Comparison Project/Video Script|Video Script]]
***Plaz or some one glues it all together
+
**then they are experts in that for debate
+
**this has advantage because it compartmentalizes the work, so it can be easily split up
+
*video????
+
**what would it be of though????
+
**the video could express the different relationships between the different cultures. Things would be represented in metaphors of course. Us as actors would represent different countries and with a clever script, this would be rather effective. This is good because it would reduce public speaking which Greg has had an unfortunate past with and seems to grasp the interest of students based on my past experiences in English with my Apartheid movie and Math with my Orchard Hideout Video. -- Groff
+
  
Dave, you still have my Mughal empire notes. I need them back on monday before cobb comes into the room, so i have at least like 2 minutes to study them.- Greg
+
==Project==
:May I recommend my notes: [[:Image:India Ancient Civalization Page 1 Instructions.JPG|Page 58 - Indian Ancient Civilization Notes Instructions]], [[:Image:India Ancient Civalization Page 2.JPG|Page 2 - Maurya Empire and Small Kingdoms]], [[:Image:India Ancient Civalization Page 3.JPG|Page 3 - Gupta Empire and Muslim Empire]], [[:Image:India Ancient Civalization Page 4.JPG|Page 4 - Mughal Empire]]--[[User:ThePlaz|Plaz]] 20:45, 10 December 2006 (EST)
+
*[[World Cultures Comparison Project/Paper|Paper]] ([[:Image:Interdependence Day.doc|Word]]) ([[:Image:Interdependence Day.pdf|PDF]])
 
+
*[[Globalization Video]]
===Cultures===
+
*Latin America (req.)
+
*Japan (food)
+
*India (?imperialism)
+
*Middle East (sharia)
+
*???
+
 
+
==Sources==
+
*http://www.waronwant.org/trade
+
 
+
==Comments==
+
 
+
Globalization: Good or Bad, is a good idea and we could use a video, but if we have a video, than we should definitely have a debate too. Don't worry Dave, that was just a fluke public speaking experience, i did fine with ms. jackson's 40 minute presentation (heck, got the best grade of my group). Besides this is only 20 minutes, so i'll be good. But yeah, we could each pick a country/region or topic involving globalization, research it, become experts, and make a heated debate using the information we gathered. We could each have pros and cons; or 2 of us could do pros, and 2 do cons if we're doing globalization as a whole. - Greg
+
 
+
We could first explain our research, show a video (if we want), and then have the debate, that should take up 20 minutes. But we still have plenty of time, so let's not worry too much about not getting the Comparisons project done. -Greg
+
 
+
Oh yeah, the newspaper idea is EXCELLENT. Let's use the newspaper as a creative handout, explaining our information. We could each write an editorial, that simply summarizes our research, and slip an opinion in the article if we want to. But we'll have to decide what our front page should look like, and make sure it covers all aspects of our project. Maybe a before/after map of globalization's effect on different cultures and regions. It'll be creative, I highly doubt anyone else would do it, and cobb would like the newspaper too.- Greg (long, but more to come as we get into the project!)
+
 
+
 
+
I actually think it might be good to end with the video for two reasons
+
#It has a determinable amount of time which can be used to meet a time requirement and end with an ending to a movie that won't be something just like: "...and that was our presentation". Instead        we would have a good ending that concluded the presentation efficiently.
+
#If the movie is good (assuming that it is good) we can end the presentation with a bang. Public speaking ettiquette clearly states that the most important elements of a presenation are the beginning and end. If the video is good then it should end the presentation so that no matter what Greg can think of to ruin the project public speaking wise. The ending will be good.
+
P.S. I am not serious Greg. However, your past is. -Groff
+
 
+
:Yeh I know, my past was bad Dave, but trust me, I'm over that. but right, if the video is GOOD, we could end the presentation on a strong note. It would be better than, "that's our presentation," but we still need to make it clear to the audience/cobb that the video is our end, like "and now we'll conclude with a video," or something like that.- Greg
+
 
+
::I agree ending with a video on a strong note is good.  However, should we do all 3 things (debate, video, newspaper) and the required paper??  That would seem like too much.  If you read the [[:Image:Comparisions Project Instructions.JPG|directions]] they don't mention class handouts; only paper (standard) and oral presentation/video.  Thus it can be half/half with video and debate.  But what does the video show?  Some ideas:
+
*act out changes before/after
+
**requires acting
+
*news show talking about new fast food place opening
+
*protest WTO meetings
+
*collection of news clips
+
**clips would need to be avalible
+
***http://youtube.com/watch?v=E1Oj7Hk31LY
+
***we could just show that or cup it up and find a pro- version
+
*what else???
+
 
+
 
+
I can script video off of youtube and possibly google video put preferably youtube if you tell me the url for it and then be able to edit it when necessary. I am content with no newspaper because I guess we don't need a handout and it would cost about $150 to print it on real tabloid newspaper (to print it on gloss, it would be $25-$50 + ink). The script will have to be a united effort. Greg, you don't say what you last said about "now we'll conclude with a video" because that it is a little knick that doesn't need to be discussed in the preliminary stage. Greg, I understand that your problem has gone away, but the past really never leaves. -Groff
+
 
+
::I can convert YouTube and Google Videos too.  That would be easier (and more professional) if we mix together already done videos.  Also, someone could use it as part of their argument in the debate.  As for scripting the debate - that is more work and may lead to a duller debate.  On the other hand, if people aren't experts in what they are arguing, it will fall apart fast.  Maybe just a list of qu and outlines of view and then go from their.  Or practice a few times and then just use that experience (plus an outline) to go.  Word for word reading can suck the excitement out of it. [[User:ThePlaz|Plaz]] 16:38, 8 December 2006 (EST)
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
Plaz, you read into things much too much. I was talking about the script for the movie, not the debate. About the youtube/google video I meant download so you could import into an editing tool like Movie Maker or your aspirational Premiere, ha ha (saw the unboxing video). If you want to invest a lot of money into this, I would go with the Adobe Video Production Suite that I use at my cousin's studio that has Adobe After Effects, Premiere, DVD Encore, Photoshop, Flash and more (see http://www.adobe.com/products/bundles/video_bundle.html). The whole idea about having the video just use professional clips is that that tends to be boring unless you have a back-story to fall onto. If you ever watch CNN, channel 50, they use a lot of media from other stations but only use it to supplement their own show, not create it. This is the point where you are either making things look profesional or you are making them look like an average kid did. Mr. Cobb would want something that shows what we learned in a better design and what-not. Gotta go study for India. See ya. -Groff
+
 
+
Sure Groff, I would be glad to use the Video Bundle (if you would give me the $2,099 it costs).  I agree that using clips is boring.  So what can we do for the video? --[[User:ThePlaz|Plaz]] 17:20, 9 December 2006 (EST)
+
 
+
 
+
I told you that I have access to the Adobe Video Bundle and can use the video programs to edit properly and create a good film for the class to see. We could also write a script and since you told me you have access to a good camera, we can use that to film us. We could represent our globalization ideas through metaphors (i.e. say we think globalization improves technology, we could have an actor be living life and then another coming and helping and showing him somthing new. Using my editing and a clever script with good acting (*cough Greg *cough), we can effectively use a video. Also, could you tell me what the names are of those guys who play the instruments and their songs. I didn't write them down that day because I wasn't sure what he was saying. Thanks a lot.
+
P.S. You can email me at Cooldaveg73@aol.com. Thanks again
+
P.P.S. Plaz, you could always do like me and get beta versions and do reports for Adobe. It's free and easy.
+
-Groff
+
 
+
 
+
I understand that the debate is the type of presentation that Mr. Cobb suggested on page 65 of the notebook, but it is relatively vague and open. In my experiences with presentations, people like me and Greg tend to just offer a minimal amount and go way under time even if we practice. People like you Plaz tend to really elaborate and offer good insight but then bore the class, and people like Jeff do nothing. If at all possible, I think we should add another element to the presentation if at all possible.
+
-Groff
+
 
+
:Then how 'bout a 10-10 minute time split.  I think we could do it.  Does it have to be greater then 20 minutes or would 15-17 also work.. We can defently make this work, especailly if we fill part of the debate time with pre-preparred introductory statements and I prod people for answers.  Do you have any better suggestions?  --[[User:ThePlaz|Plaz]] 18:27, 12 December 2006 (EST)
+
 
+
 
+
I don't think we could do 15-17 split because I talked to some kids from last year and they said they had 30-minute presenations! We should ask Mr. Cobb before we go any further and we should do it as a group sometime after class. Peace up, A-town. -Groff
+
 
+
Errr, uhh soo.....what is the difference between the globalization of the eastern hemisphere and the western and does that effect the conflict in Iraq and if it does why doesn't Kim Jong Il just go into France and get Pervez Musharaff out of his democratic presidency.  Musharaff and the jews obviously started WWII and he needs to be kicked out of office and those damn french fries need to grow up and get a real leader, like colin powell or something, he was a great fighter pilot in WWI and I'm sure he could lead them into the 13th century.-Bill Cobber
+
 
+
==Outline==
+
*Proposal--[[User:ThePlaz|Plaz]] 21:32, 11 December 2006 (EST)
+
===Video===
+
'''Globalization Intro'''
+
*~5 min
+
*introduces what it is and different definitions
+
*gives short history
+
*done in uber-documentary format
+
**real deep announcer voice
+
**like in Dodgeball movie
+
*mix of old? and new (we film) clips
+
 
+
===Debate===
+
Then debate
+
*~15 min
+
*each person specializes in topic
+
====Topics====
+
=====Pro=====
+
*economic prospective (plaz or groff only please!)
+
**free trade
+
**most efficient
+
**are going to be learning this is a few weeks in class
+
*stats support
+
**see wikipedia article: [[wp:Globalization]]
+
*ending harsh sharia pratices
+
**middle east
+
*jobs
+
**usa to India
+
=====Con=====
+
*China
+
**diet
+
**see fast food nation book
+
***i have it and will lend it to whoever does this
+
*exporting artificial wants
+
**in general
+
*less job security
+
*destroying culture
+
*latin america
+
**www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/integration/download/publicat/4_3_208_wcsdg-wp-23.pdf
+
 
+
I agree w/Dave, theres a 90% chance i'll undershoot my part by like 1-2 mins. I think Jeff could make his part work well, but we could always add like a 1-2 min. rant in our debate to make up 4 lost time.- Greg, 12 December 2006
+

Latest revision as of 01:00, 3 May 2009

World Cultures Comparison (Final) Project on Globalization


David Groff, Jeff Barry, Greg Nicosia, and Michael Plasmeier had to for the World Cultures final project, compare a specific topic among different nations. As we brainstormed, it morphed into more about what globalization is all about. The project consists of a paper along with a 20 minute minimum oral presentation. We chose to show a introduction video and then debate: globalization: good or bad?. It was lots of fun and I learned a lot about globalization, a force changing our world today. So if for good or bad, globalization will change everything. Our teacher said no one has ever done globalization as a topic. That was surprising. So here are all of our brainstorming and work. Enjoy.

Grade:198/200

Points off for poor time management in debate; but movie was superb and we really knew what we were talking about. Good job group members!

Instructions

Planning

Project