Difference between revisions of "Amazing Grace Movie Review"

From ThePlaz.com

Jump to: navigation, search
(Sources: post movie and 2 reviews)
(review and add out of many as source)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[:Category:American Studies|American Studies]] ''Amazing Grace (2006)'' ([http://www.amazon.com/Amazing-Grace-Nicholas-Farrell/dp/B000VNMMQG/ Amazon]) Movie Report
 
[[:Category:American Studies|American Studies]] ''Amazing Grace (2006)'' ([http://www.amazon.com/Amazing-Grace-Nicholas-Farrell/dp/B000VNMMQG/ Amazon]) Movie Report
 
==Summary==
 
==Summary==
''Amazing Grace'' follows the political life of William Wilberforce who fought, and succeeded, the end the slave trade in the British Empire.  Wilberforce worked past countless opposition before the British Parliament voted in his favor.  The film also shows John Newton, an Anglican clergyman, and the writing of his famous hymn, ''Amazing Grace''.  It takes Wilberforce 20 years to end the slave trade, during which his health suffers.  His efforts are ultimately successful, and lead to the ending of the British slave trade.
+
''Amazing Grace'' follows the political life of William Wilberforce who fought, and succeeded, the end the slave trade in the British Empire.  Wilberforce worked through years of opposition before the British Parliament voted to end the slave trade.  The film also tells the story of John Newton, an Anglican clergyman, and the writing of his famous hymn, ''Amazing Grace''.  During the nearly 20 years Wilberforce campaigns, his health suffers and he gets married.  However, he remains dedicated to his work.  He must convince the British Parliament of the evils of slavery, thought by some to be just rumors.  His efforts are ultimately successful, and lead to the end of the British slave trade.
  
==My Review==
+
==Connection==
===Objective===
+
''Amazing Grace'' tells the story of the banning of the slave trade from a British political perspective.  Although we did not talk much about the British banning of the slave trade, with the exception that it scarred pro-slavery Southerners, the political process of banning slavery was similar in both the British Empire and the United States.
Susan Walker for the ''Toronto Star'' states that the film is "pretty – even overly – faithful to history".  Although I did not know much about the British fight to end slavery, the arguments from the opposition are the same as we studied in class.
+
  
This film taught me a lot about the life of a member of Parliament trying to end slavery.  Before he could get them to vote against slavery, he had to show members of Parliament, who lived lives of luxury, that slavery was very painful and inhumane.
+
The main obstacle faced by abolitionists were the politicians who benefited economically by slavery.  In defense of the institution which made them quite wealthy, they made up many excuses.  For example, in ''Amazing Grace'', a member of parliament states that, "there is no documentation that Africans had any objections to slavery"This is similar to when James Henry Hammond said that slavery had produced the "highest toned, the purest, best organization of society that had ever existed on the face of the earth" (<u>Out of Many</u> 319).
  
===Subjective===
+
==Reviews==
I enjoyed the film, however I would to agree with the reviewer from the ''Chronicle'' that it contained mostly talking. Film is a visual medium which is a good opportunity to show the horrors of slaveryOn the other hand the lack of pictures mirrors the situation in the Parliament, who, at the time, had little proof of the horrors of slavery.  Nevertheless, it was interesting to see the life of an abolitionist fight against other politicians who are blind to the horrors of slavery.
+
Bruce Westbrook of the Houston Chronicle gave ''Amazing Grace'' 2.5 stars out of 5 in his review of the movie on February 23rd, 2007His main objections with the film center around the fact that the film is mostly about one man, born to the privileged class, with a house full of servants, talking about the horrors of slavery.  As Westbrook points out, "the drama suffers from the same thing that made its heroes' fight so difficult: No slaves are in sight".  The politicians only talk about slavery and try to gather evidence to show that it was horrible.
  
I would only recommend this film to those interested in the history of the British Empire or slaveryFor those who have little interest in history, I would only recommend this film as a sleep aid.
+
Westbrook believes that the true hero of ''Amazing Grace'' is the former slave-ship captain turned minister, John NewtonHe is said in the film to have written the hymn ''Amazing Grace'' and said the famous quote, "I was blind, but now I can see".
  
==Connection==
+
==My Review==
''Amazing Grace'' tells the story of the banning of the slave trade from a British political perspective.  Although we did not talk much about the British banning of the slave trade, with the exception that it scarred proslvery Southerners, the political process of banning slavery was similar in both the British Empire and the United States.
+
===Objective===
 +
Susan Walker for the ''Toronto Star'' states that the film is "pretty – even overly – faithful to history".  Although I did not know much about the British fight to end slavery, the pro-slavery arguments are similar to the ones we studied in class.  Thus I believe that the movie is faithful to history.
  
The main obstacle faced by abolitionists were the politicians who benefited economically by slavery.  In defense of the institution which made them quite wealthy, they made up many excuses.  For example, in ''Amazing Grace'', a member of parliament states that, "there is no documentation that Africans had any objections to slavery"This is similar to when James Henry Hammond said that slavery had produced the "highest toned, the purest, best organization of society that had ever existed on the face of the earth" (<u>Out of Many</u> 319).
+
This film taught me a lot about the life of a member of Parliament trying to end slavery.  Before Wilberforce could get other members of Parliament to vote against slavery, he had to show them that slavery was very painful and inhumane.  His does a pretty good job explaining it, but the viewer is never visually shown the evils of slavery.
  
==Reviews==
+
===Subjective===
Bruce Westbrook of the Houston Chronicle gave ''Amazing Grace'' 2.5 stars out of 5 in his review of the movie on February 23rd, 2007His main objections with the film center around the fact that the film is mostly one man, born to the privileged class with a house full of servants, talking about the horrors of slaveryAs Westbrook points out, "the drama suffers from the same thing that made its heroes' fight so difficult: No slaves are in sight".
+
I enjoyed the film, however I would to agree with the reviewer from the ''Chronicle'' that it contained mostly talking. Film is a visual medium which is a good opportunity to show the horrors of slaveryOn the other hand, the lack of imagery mirrors the situation in Parliament, which, at the time, had little proof of what really happened to an enslaved personNevertheless, it was interesting to see the life of an abolitionist fight against other politicians who are blind to the truth. (A timeless classic - Does the Iraq war sound familiar?)
  
Westbrook believes that the true hero of ''Amazing Grace'' is the former slave-ship captain turned minister, John NewtonHe is said in the film to have written the hymn ''Amazing Grace'' and said that "I was blind, but now I can see".
+
I would only recommend this film to those interested in the history of the British Empire or slaveryFor those who have little interest in history, I would only recommend this film as a sleep aid.
  
 
==Sources==
 
==Sources==
Line 29: Line 29:
 
*Walker, Susan. "'Amazing Grace': Slave labour". <u>Toronto Star</u>.  23 Mar 2007. 3 Dec 2007 <http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/article/195212>.
 
*Walker, Susan. "'Amazing Grace': Slave labour". <u>Toronto Star</u>.  23 Mar 2007. 3 Dec 2007 <http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/article/195212>.
 
*Westbrook, Bruce. "A good-hearted look at the song, fight against slavery". <u>Houston Chronicle</u>. 23 Feb 2007. 3 Dec 2007 <http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ent/movies/reviews/4530049.html>.
 
*Westbrook, Bruce. "A good-hearted look at the song, fight against slavery". <u>Houston Chronicle</u>. 23 Feb 2007. 3 Dec 2007 <http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ent/movies/reviews/4530049.html>.
 +
*Faragher, John Mack, et al. <u>Out of Many: a history of the American people</u>. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002.
 
[[Category:American Studies]]
 
[[Category:American Studies]]

Revision as of 02:04, 4 December 2007

DVD Cover

American Studies Amazing Grace (2006) (Amazon) Movie Report

Contents

Summary

Amazing Grace follows the political life of William Wilberforce who fought, and succeeded, the end the slave trade in the British Empire. Wilberforce worked through years of opposition before the British Parliament voted to end the slave trade. The film also tells the story of John Newton, an Anglican clergyman, and the writing of his famous hymn, Amazing Grace. During the nearly 20 years Wilberforce campaigns, his health suffers and he gets married. However, he remains dedicated to his work. He must convince the British Parliament of the evils of slavery, thought by some to be just rumors. His efforts are ultimately successful, and lead to the end of the British slave trade.

Connection

Amazing Grace tells the story of the banning of the slave trade from a British political perspective. Although we did not talk much about the British banning of the slave trade, with the exception that it scarred pro-slavery Southerners, the political process of banning slavery was similar in both the British Empire and the United States.

The main obstacle faced by abolitionists were the politicians who benefited economically by slavery. In defense of the institution which made them quite wealthy, they made up many excuses. For example, in Amazing Grace, a member of parliament states that, "there is no documentation that Africans had any objections to slavery". This is similar to when James Henry Hammond said that slavery had produced the "highest toned, the purest, best organization of society that had ever existed on the face of the earth" (Out of Many 319).

Reviews

Bruce Westbrook of the Houston Chronicle gave Amazing Grace 2.5 stars out of 5 in his review of the movie on February 23rd, 2007. His main objections with the film center around the fact that the film is mostly about one man, born to the privileged class, with a house full of servants, talking about the horrors of slavery. As Westbrook points out, "the drama suffers from the same thing that made its heroes' fight so difficult: No slaves are in sight". The politicians only talk about slavery and try to gather evidence to show that it was horrible.

Westbrook believes that the true hero of Amazing Grace is the former slave-ship captain turned minister, John Newton. He is said in the film to have written the hymn Amazing Grace and said the famous quote, "I was blind, but now I can see".

My Review

Objective

Susan Walker for the Toronto Star states that the film is "pretty – even overly – faithful to history". Although I did not know much about the British fight to end slavery, the pro-slavery arguments are similar to the ones we studied in class. Thus I believe that the movie is faithful to history.

This film taught me a lot about the life of a member of Parliament trying to end slavery. Before Wilberforce could get other members of Parliament to vote against slavery, he had to show them that slavery was very painful and inhumane. His does a pretty good job explaining it, but the viewer is never visually shown the evils of slavery.

Subjective

I enjoyed the film, however I would to agree with the reviewer from the Chronicle that it contained mostly talking. Film is a visual medium which is a good opportunity to show the horrors of slavery. On the other hand, the lack of imagery mirrors the situation in Parliament, which, at the time, had little proof of what really happened to an enslaved person. Nevertheless, it was interesting to see the life of an abolitionist fight against other politicians who are blind to the truth. (A timeless classic - Does the Iraq war sound familiar?)

I would only recommend this film to those interested in the history of the British Empire or slavery. For those who have little interest in history, I would only recommend this film as a sleep aid.

Sources