Difference between revisions of "6.170"
From ThePlaz.com
 (post)  | 
			 (remove links)  | 
			||
| (One intermediate revision by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''6.170 Software Studio ''' is a [[Course 6 EECS]] ([[Engineering]]) class I   | + | '''6.170 Software Studio ''' is a [[Course 6 EECS]] ([[Engineering]]) class I took with [http://people.csail.mit.edu/dnj/ Daniel Jackson] at [[MIT]] as a [[MIT Senior|Senior]] spring semester.    | 
*Class website: http://stellar.mit.edu/S/course/6/sp13/6.170/index.html  | *Class website: http://stellar.mit.edu/S/course/6/sp13/6.170/index.html  | ||
*[http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-170-laboratory-in-software-engineering-fall-2005/index.htm OCW from 2005] - The class was very different back then.  | *[http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-170-laboratory-in-software-engineering-fall-2005/index.htm OCW from 2005] - The class was very different back then.  | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{GradeS|A|}}  | ||
{{Class Review|I really liked this class and Daniel Jackson.  I wish more of the students appreciated it.  Also I don't think the TAs got it - they graded strictly off a rubric.}}  | {{Class Review|I really liked this class and Daniel Jackson.  I wish more of the students appreciated it.  Also I don't think the TAs got it - they graded strictly off a rubric.}}  | ||
| Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
[[Category:MIT Senior]]  | [[Category:MIT Senior]]  | ||
[[Category:Course 6 EECS]]  | [[Category:Course 6 EECS]]  | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 06:25, 15 September 2013
6.170 Software Studio is a Course 6 EECS (Engineering) class I took with Daniel Jackson at MIT as a Senior spring semester.
- Class website: http://stellar.mit.edu/S/course/6/sp13/6.170/index.html
 - OCW from 2005 - The class was very different back then.
 
Grade:A
Class Review
I really liked this class and Daniel Jackson. I wish more of the students appreciated it. Also I don't think the TAs got it - they graded strictly off a rubric.
- P0
 
- P1
 
- P4
 
Notes Quality
Notes should be of good quality.


